Experts call for construction process reform
Objections and appeals are among the most serious obstacles to residential construction in Switzerland. A new study shows that they not only cause construction delays, but also higher housing prices. Experts are calling for clear legal intervention for greater efficiency, legal certainty and affordable housing.
A study conducted on behalf of the Federal Office for Spatial Development and the Federal Office for Housing puts it in a nutshell. Objections (60 %) and appeals (61 %) are considered to be the biggest obstacles to the realisation of new projects for Swiss housing developers. In the comprehensive survey of over 440 experts from the construction industry, architecture, law and administration, it became clear that the current system is largely too susceptible to delays and abuse.
In particular, so-called abusive objections are a source of displeasure. These often do not serve to protect legitimate interests, but to deliberately block construction projects, sometimes with extortionate motives.
Massive consequences for the market and society
The impact on the housing market is far-reaching. Around 80 per cent of the construction managers surveyed stated that objections and appeals were delaying the market launch of flats. 71 per cent reported significant cost increases, which is ultimately reflected in higher rents and purchase prices.
Especially in times of acute housing shortages, this development harbours political and social dynamite. Calls for decisive countermeasures are growing louder.
Experts call for targeted intervention in the appeals process
The authors of the study propose far-reaching measures that the federal government, cantons and municipalities should implement in order to speed up planning and approval processes. A key recommendation is that the right of appeal should be restricted to “directly and particularly affected persons”. Residents with a general interest would no longer be automatically legitimised.
In addition, admissible objections should in future be limited to specific, individual interests. The abolition of the suspensive effect of building law appeals is also under discussion in order to counteract arbitrary delays.
Systemic relief for the authorities
Another lever relates to the structure of the appeal bodies. A reduction in the number of appeal stages, improved coordination between the relevant authorities and clearly defined deadlines could noticeably speed up procedures. It is also crucial that the authorisation offices are adequately staffed, particularly in cities with high levels of construction activity.
Political decisions are imminent
The study was conducted as part of the national action plan against housing shortages. The ARE and the BWO are now examining the proposed measures for forwarding to DETEC and the EAER. On this basis, the Federal Council will decide which proposals to recommend for implementation.
One thing is certain: without far-reaching adjustments to the legal protection procedure, there is a risk of further years of deadlock. The political will for structural reform is now needed for sustainable housing development.